I hate blogs

22 September 2006
Categories: Self-referential

So just for fun I’m trying a post from my BlackBerry. Not bad so far, although I need practice on this tiny kybard.

I already understand the attraction of weblogs. It’s so easy to get caught up in what’s frankly a form of mental masturbation. The best thing for any weblogger to keep in mind is that no one will or should ever find interest in this. The biggest risk is in thinking that you’re writing for some form of posterity. Keep the filters turned off, don’t pretend you’re writing for anyone but yourself, and you just might come up with something worthy some day.

I recall (perhaps erroneously) that Dave Sim, creator of the epic graphic novel Cerebus, once wrote that if you want to learn to draw well, get a six-foot-tall stack of paper and draw your way through it. Consider this the written equivalent.

I also put a lot of value in an excellent essay written by one of my favourite authors, Samuel R. Delany, that appears in the back of the collection Aye, and Gomorrah: And Other Stories. On the subject of writing well, he says (and I’m paraphrasing horribly) that one must never consider one’s work to be written in stone, that it can always be changed, even after publication. That false impression of staticness is just another form of self-filtering, and good writing almost always benefits from a complete lack of self-filtering. In that sense, a weblog is a good thing—because even after I hit the “Publish” button, there’s always another “Edit” button waiting for me.

The thing is, I hate blogs. More to the point, I hate the word “blog.” What a dumb truncation of a mediocre portmanteau that rolls off the tongue like a flu-ridden loogie. And of course, most weblogs, this one included, are really just what I said before: mental masturbation. Talky, in-jokey, rambling. I’m much amused to find, more than a year after I posted it in a fit of waggish pique, that “blogorrhea” (a portmanteau of “blog” and “logorrhea”, meaning excessive and/or incoherent talkativeness in a weblog) remains in Wikipedia’s list of blogging terms, despite a lot of discussion that implies (but never states directly) that it’s a made-up word that has never been used anywhere other than in that list. Of course it’s a made-up word—I’m trying to create a neologism here. And god knows there’s a lot of blogorrhea out there.

And in here.

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.